Uncommons

Daniel Schmachtenberger primarily studies the concept of "Metacrisis," which encapsulates the comprehensiveness of the risks faced by humanity and the Earth.

Daniel Schmachtenberger primarily studies the concept of "Metacrisis," which encapsulates the comprehensiveness of the risks faced by humanity and the Earth. This series will be divided into three parts: first, it will discuss what the Metacrisis is and how to create a third attractor to address it; then it will discuss the criteria for addressing the Metacrisis; and finally, it will explore topics related to Web 3.0, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFTs, and more. This episode is the first in a series of episodes collaborating with Daniel, delving into the Metacrisis and how we can best respond to it.

Daniel Schmachtenberger is a systems thinker with extensive experience across fields such as game theory, political science, history, economics, and social sciences. He will discuss systemic risks faced by humanity, including the root causes of global coordination failures. Daniel is a founding member of the Consilience Project, which aims to improve public understanding and dialogue, particularly regarding systemic risks.

Current bounty 丨 $267.00
Course representative ｜ Cube
Review ｜寒鸦
Typesetting ｜豚

Prerequisite Knowledge: Beck's Risk Society Theory#

Social Stages: Class Society and Risk Society

• Class society, or classical industrial society, centers on wealth production.

• Risk society centers on risk distribution.

Logic of Social Operation: Wealth Distribution and Risk Distribution

• Wealth distribution: The operational logic of class society is to liberate people from nature, focusing on how to distribute wealth unequally yet "legally," desiring scarce goods; wealth accumulates among the upper class, and wealth determines thought.

• Risk distribution: The operational logic of risk society is to mitigate and channel risks, focusing on technology-production itself, as modernity gradually becomes a force of self-destruction; people want to manage negative impacts, with risks accumulating among the lower classes, and knowledge determining risk status.

Value System: Inequality and Insecurity

• Inequality: People in class society actively pursue equality, seeking material wealth.

• Insecurity: People in risk society passively defend against risks, leading to anxiety and self-limitation.

Nature of Risks

• Dangers are natural disasters, while risks are human-made and closely related to systems.

• In class society, risks are limited, perceivable, and calculable, belonging to residual risks, adhering to the "polluter pays principle."

• In risk society, risks are global, imperceptible, and incalculable, occupying a central position, gradually forming "organized irresponsibility."

Understanding the Metacrisis#

Metacrisis#

The Metacrisis is a comprehensive crisis that includes climate change, ecosystem collapse, technological threats (such as artificial intelligence and biotechnology), and global supply chain vulnerabilities. It is an aggregation of a series of global risks and issues. The complexity of the Metacrisis means that addressing single issues like climate change is insufficient. These issues share common underlying patterns, necessitating consideration of the fundamental generative mechanisms of these problems, such as multipolar traps, game theory, and the tragedy of the commons. Addressing the Metacrisis cannot be done by solving each problem in isolation; rather, it requires thinking about how to coordinate humanity's actions to tackle shared challenges.

Third Attractor#

"Attractor" refers to a general direction that a complex system tends to move towards, even if its path cannot be accurately predicted. This is similar to observing a drainage basin geographically, where raindrops may flow along different paths but ultimately converge into a specific lake.

Today, there are two high-level attractors in the world: catastrophes and repressive control structures. Catastrophes refer to collective disasters caused by failures in decentralized collective action, including climate issues, leading to numerous problems stemming from coordination failures. The ability to disperse disasters is easily obtained, which increases overall risk. To prevent threats, large-scale monitoring and control are needed; however, excessive surveillance and control may lead to repressive control structures that threaten individual freedoms. Therefore, when creating a world that can avoid disasters and has self-monitoring mechanisms, it is essential to consider trade-offs and checks and balances.

"The third attractor" discusses creating a world that is neither catastrophic nor repressive, avoiding disasters while ensuring that regulatory structures have internal checks to prevent corruption. The "third attractor" represents the ideal world that people hope to create, avoiding potential disasters while protecting individual freedoms.

Multipolar Trap#

Coordination failure is essentially a form of a multipolar trap, where multiple agents, each acting according to their own rational self-interest, lead to outcomes that are harmful to everyone in the long run. However, individual agents cannot make the best long-term choices. Difficulties arise when attempting to enforce international agreements to prevent these global coordination failures, as there is no effective international enforcement body. Therefore, law and central coordination play a crucial role in addressing coordination failures.

Metacrisis Matrix#

Understanding the Metacrisis through a matrix that describes problems and solutions. Define two typological criteria: the ability to solve coordination failures and the degree of centralization and corruption of government and monitoring systems. The Metacrisis is a state hanging between disaster and oppression.

• Weak solving ability - weak monitoring system: Fails to adequately address coordination failures, with a decentralized or laissez-faire system, leading to disasters.

• Weak solving ability - strong monitoring system: The current situation, where neither coordination failures are solved nor a centralized system exists.

• Strong solving ability - strong monitoring system: Solves coordination failures, but centralized and corrupt government and monitoring systems lead to oppression.

• Strong solving ability - weak monitoring system: Solves coordination failures without a centralized or corrupt system, which is the "third attractor" we hope to achieve.

Breaking the Metacrisis#

Path Mechanism#

Addressing disasters or oppression may trigger unintended consequences. Attempting to solve disasters may lead to more oppression, while trying to solve oppression may result in more disasters. The interconnections and complexities between problems make solutions more complicated, as multiple factors need to be considered to ensure that solving one problem does not trigger another. For example, the relationship between global GDP growth and energy use and climate change, the interdependence of issues, and the need to consider factors across multiple domains to find viable solutions.

How do we face this crisis? One approach is to view problems as instances of deeper patterns rather than isolated issues. This helps us understand the common patterns between problems and how addressing these deeper patterns impacts different domains. By identifying and addressing these deeper patterns, we can take steps toward solving the overall problem, even though it remains a daunting task.

Using Mandatory Transparency as an Example#

Using mandatory transparency as an example, we can understand how to leverage technology to address some global issues and how to change the direction of technology to build a more viable third attractor. For instance, satellite imaging technology can provide real-time images of the Earth's surface, helping to reveal illegal activities such as illegal fishing, logging, and mining, thereby facilitating the establishment and enforcement of international agreements. This transparency helps improve the situation of multipolar traps by providing more information, making coordination and cooperation possible. Taking blockchain technology as an example, it emphasizes the importance of transparency, thereby promoting global collaboration. Blockchain can provide greater transparency, reduce corruption and distrust, and thus provide a stronger foundation for trust. Therefore, technology can be part of the solution to global problems, and changing the direction of technology can significantly promote cooperation and coordination.

A Qualitative World Belonging to Humanity#

Human nature is what inspires hope; the world needs collective solutions to the Metacrisis. We have the potential to improve the world, readjusting the use of technology and artificial intelligence to empower humanity itself, forming a "race to the top." To achieve this, we need to redefine the role belonging to humanity, allowing artificial intelligence to support more routine and quantitative tasks, enabling individuals to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives.

A high-resolution democratic vision. With the support of technology, there is hope for achieving wiser and more collaborative decision-making on a global scale. Artificial intelligence helps expand the capacity for collective wisdom while retaining bottom-up decision-making processes, which is an exciting prospect. Humanity collaborates meaningfully through technology, utilizing their collective wisdom, empathy, and creativity to shape a fairer and more sustainable world.

Things That Bring Hope#

Assessing real politics is crucial. Developmental psychology indicates that cognitive and moral abilities exist at different developmental levels across the population and can be promoted through technology, economic systems, and educational systems. The Gaussian distribution of violence and rationality can change through alterations in social structures. Technology, especially social media algorithms like Facebook's, can play a significant role in cultural development. If these algorithms are designed to correct biases and expand interpersonal networks, they could rapidly propel a cultural enlightenment movement faster than at any previous time.

Technology, Humanity, Hope, Faith#

The comprehensive application of technology along with its regulation, incentive mechanisms, etc., can have profound effects. At the same time, human nature possesses great plasticity and potential, which can be enhanced through technology, culture, and other means, rather than being limited to its inherent state.

Regarding faith and hope, even without religious beliefs, people need a special type of faith, which means not knowing what the solution is but believing that there may be pathways to solving problems within the unknown factors. This faith encourages people to learn and innovate while avoiding the false certainties of catastrophism, as unknown factors may contain solutions we have yet to understand.

Innovation is necessary, and it requires steadfast faith and commitment to continually strive to solve problems.

Optimism and Pessimism#

From an optimistic perspective, it is associated with solving problems and unknown factors. One must commit to making efforts to solve problems, even without knowing how to do so. This optimism indicates that solutions exist in the unknown realm, and there is a moral responsibility to address the issue. This means that even without knowing how to proceed, one should commit to and strive to solve, not easily giving up. This commitment signifies that even in failure, one will continue to seek new methods rather than surrender. This is the most likely way to achieve success, even if one can face failure with composure.

From a pessimistic perspective, it is used for red teaming specific propositions. (Note: Red teaming essentially involves penetration testing, social engineering, and open-source intelligence research in a comprehensive attack simulation to assess risks and patch vulnerabilities from an overall perspective.) The concept of red teaming is to scrutinize one's ideas with a pessimistic mindset. Pessimism serves to realize optimism more effectively. Its role is to identify problems so that they can be recognized and improved before failure occurs, rather than discovering issues after investing significant time and money.

Efforts should be made to strike a balance between optimism and pessimism, using red teaming methods to enhance the quality of problem-solving. This is an internal, self-learning process, as well as a team process that should occur within groups. Optimism should be combined with solving problems and unknown factors, while pessimism should be applied to red teaming specific propositions; this process is both internal to individuals and inter-team.

People in the community should not only conduct red teaming from a cryptographic perspective but also assess whether actions are wise and whether they may trigger problems elsewhere. This approach helps design more robust and inclusive solutions. People should not fear hearing problems or negative feedback, as this aids in improving designs and avoiding potential issues.

[1] Beck U. & Ritter M. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.

[2] Daniel Schmachtenberger: https://civilizationemerging.com/about/

[3] Meditations on Moloch: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/

[4] Daniel's extended blog: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/daniel-schmachtenberger-bend-not-break-2-maximum-power/id1604218333?i=1000563793660

[5] Consilience Project: https://consilienceproject.org/

We continue to pay attention to the latest developments in the GreenPill crypto thought. Among them, the podcast "GreenPill" is hosted by Kevin Owocki himself and is also a sub-column of Bankless Youtube. Continuously tracking and co-learning from the "GreenPill" podcast is to keep up with the latest frontiers of renewable crypto thought.

This episode's podcast link: https://youtu.be/WVEP0zAK-xQ

Subscribe to the podcast 丨https://availableon.com/greenpill

The Network State website 丨https://thenetworkstate.com/

(including books and podcast resources)

As a Workstream project initiated in the Uncommons community, "GreenPill Podcast Co-learning" adopts a co-creation format, encouraging more people to get involved. Specifically, we are recruiting the following roles:

Course Representative

• Listen to the podcast, produce notes after listening, and publish them on the Uncommons community media account.

• What is required is not translation! But rather expansion and summarization based on content understanding.

• Share your notes and understanding in co-learning sessions.

• Bounty will be issued based on podcast duration, at 3 USDT per minute.

Typesetter

• Typeset based on the content produced by the course representative and column information.

• 15 USDT per article.

If you are interested in the above roles, please sign up on our Dework page: https://app.dework.xyz/greenpill

If you are interested in our Workstream, please copy and open our Notion page: https://greenpillcn.notion.site/GreenPill-62cbfc461cb44fd0a55f62a8104928bc

Our related output content will continue to be published on Uncommons community media platforms, please stay tuned.

Uncommons is a public sphere where a collective of Commons Builders explores Crypto Thoughts together.

Uncommons is a public welfare community spontaneously organized by Web3 enthusiasts, social builders, and internet citizens dedicated to building public goods, formerly known as the GreenPill Chinese community.

Telegram: https://t.me/theuncommons

Notion: https://uncommons.notion.site

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Un__commons